UCA Formal Specification v0.1.0
The universal adapter that maps constitutional interfaces to external systems — the constitutional boundary between the sovereign interior and the external world.
Preamble
This document is the formal specification of the Universal Constitutional Adapter (UCA) — Layer 6.1 of the ICore ecosystem. UCA is the last constitutional layer: everything beyond UCA is external, never part of the constitution itself.
UCA does not implement anything constitutionally new. UCA is the boundary condition that makes sovereignty possible in a world of external systems. Without UCA, the constitution is isolated. With UCA, the constitution is sovereign everywhere.
Classification: Constitutional — defines the adaptation boundary for all of ICore.
Derivation:
USR/CoreFab → UCA (adapter boundary)
Depends on: USR/CoreFab (adapters bridge the runtime, not raw abstractions).
Depended on by: UCD (derivatives compose from UCA capabilities), all external integrations.
Section 1: Foundational Axioms
1.1 The Four Adapter Axioms
| # | Axiom | Statement | Derived From |
|---|
| AA1 | The constitution never depends on an adapter. | The direction of dependency is absolute and non-negotiable: adapters depend on the constitution; the constitution never depends on an adapter. Remove any adapter and the constitution remains complete. | Constraint (USCP) |
| AA2 | Adapters are replaceable. | Any adapter may be replaced by any other adapter that fulfills the same constitutional purpose, without any constitutional change. The constitution is adapter-agnostic. | Transformation (USCP) |
| AA3 | The boundary is absolute. | UCA is the last constitutional layer. Everything beyond UCA is external. No external system has constitutional standing. No external system may alter the constitutional stack. | Existence (USCP) |
| AA4 | Adapters are constitutional only when bridging. | An adapter exists only to bridge a specific constitutional capability to a specific external system. An adapter that does not bridge — that exists for its own sake — is not a constitutional adapter. | Identity (USCP) |
1.2 Axiom Sufficiency
| Primitive | Present In | Role |
|---|
| Existence | AA3 (boundary) | External systems exist beyond the constitutional boundary |
| Identity | AA4 (bridging purpose) | Adapters are identified by what they bridge, not by what they are |
| Relationship | AA1 (dependency direction) | The only permitted relationship is adapter → constitution, never the reverse |
| Constraint | AA1 (never depended upon) | Adapters are constrained from becoming constitutional dependencies |
| Transformation | AA2 (replaceability) | Adapters may change freely; the constitution does not |
| Verification | AA3 (boundary enforcement) | The boundary is verified by checking that no constitutional component references an external system |
The four axioms cover all six primitives. The foundation is complete.
Section 2: The Boundary Model
2.1 The Constitutional Boundary
┌═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┐
║ CONSTITUTIONAL INTERIOR ║
║ ║
║ USCP → USC → Sciences → Reference → Execution ║
║ (USR/CoreFab) ║
║ ↓ ║
║ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║
║ │ UCA — THE BOUNDARY │ ║
║ │ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │ ║
║ │ │ Naming │ │ Serialization│ │ Execution │ ... │ ║
║ │ │ Adapter │ │ Adapter │ │ Adapter │ │ ║
║ │ └─────┬──────┘ └─────┬──────┘ └─────┬──────┘ │ ║
║ └────────┼───────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┘ ║
║ ↓ ↓ ↓ ║
║ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ║
║ │ DNS │ │ JSON-LD │ │ WASM │ ║
║ │ ENS │ │ CBOR-LD │ │ Rust │ ║
║ │ Handshake│ │ RDF │ │ Deno │ ║
║ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ ║
║ ║
║ EXTERNAL WORLD — no constitutional standing ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
2.2 Boundary Properties
| # | Property | Statement |
|---|
| BP1 | Unidirectional | Information flows from the constitutional interior through UCA to external systems, and from external systems through UCA to the interior. But authority flows only inward — external systems never authorize constitutional action. |
| BP2 | Complete | Every interaction between the constitutional stack and the external world must pass through UCA. There are no constitutional backdoors. |
| BP3 | Transparent | The boundary is visible and auditable. Every adapter is declared, named, and versioned. Nothing crosses the boundary untracked. |
| BP4 | Thin | UCA adds no constitutional theory. It adds no primitives, no rules, no axioms. UCA is the thinnest possible layer — a membrane, not a wall. |
2.3 What Crosses the Boundary
| Direction | What Crosses | What Doesn't |
|---|
| Interior → Exterior | Serialized constitutional data, resolution requests, execution requests | Constitutional meaning, derivation chains, verification results |
| Exterior → Interior | Raw data, resolved names, execution results | Authority, constitutional standing, governance power |
The constitution uses external systems. It never trusts them.
Section 3: The Adapter Contract Model
3.1 Adapter Definition
| Term | Definition |
|---|
| Adapter | A constitutionally declared, interface-bounded bridge between a specific constitutional capability and a specific external system or protocol. |
| Adapter Domain | The category of constitutional capability the adapter bridges (naming, serialization, execution, storage, communication). |
| Adapter Profile | The external system or protocol the adapter bridges to (DNS, JSON-LD, WASM, Syncthing, etc.). |
| Constitutional Footprint | The minimum surface area through which the adapter contacts the constitution. Adapters should have the smallest footprint that fulfills their bridge purpose. |
3.2 Adapter Structure
Every adapter must declare:
| Field | Requirement | Purpose |
|---|
| Name | Human-readable adapter name | Unique identification |
| Domain | One of the adapter domains (see Section 4) | Categorization |
| Profile | The external system/protocol bridged | What this adapter connects to |
| Version | SemVer | Version tracking |
| Constitutional Layer | Always "execution" (ordinal 5) | Layer position |
| Dependencies | USR/CoreFab (always) + any adapter-layer peer | Derivation chain |
| Footprint | The specific constitutional interface consumed | Minimal contact surface |
| Replaceability | How to swap this adapter for another | Proves AA2 |
3.3 Adapter Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| AI1 | One-directional dependency | The adapter depends on the constitutional stack. The stack never depends on the adapter. |
| AI2 | Interface-bounded | The adapter contacts the constitution only through declared interfaces (WIT contracts or equivalent). No direct internal access. |
| AI3 | Replaceable | Any adapter can be removed and replaced by another adapter fulfilling the same domain purpose. The constitutional stack must not notice the difference. |
| AI4 | Non-authoritative | An adapter never generates constitutional meaning. It only translates between constitutional meaning and external formats. |
| AI5 | Explicitly declared | Every adapter must be registered and declared. Unknown adapters are constitutionally invisible and therefore inaccessible. |
| AI6 | Versioned | Adapters carry a version. The constitutional stack may depend on a version range, not a specific adapter instance. |
Section 4: Adapter Domains
4.1 The Five Domains
| # | Domain | What It Bridges | Constitutional Purpose |
|---|
| AD1 | Naming | Constitutional identity → external names | Resolve "who is this" in external systems |
| AD2 | Serialization | Constitutional meaning → external formats | Transmit constitutional data in external formats |
| AD3 | Execution | Constitutional operations → external runtimes | Execute constitutional code on external platforms |
| AD4 | Storage | Constitutional state → external storage | Persist constitutional data on external systems |
| AD5 | Communication | Constitutional messages → external channels | Deliver constitutional messages through external infrastructure |
4.2 Domain Sufficiency
Every interaction between a constitutional system and the external world falls into exactly one of these five categories:
- Naming: "How do external systems refer to this constitutional entity?"
- Serialization: "How do I serialize this constitutional data for external consumption?"
- Execution: "Where does this constitutional code actually run?"
- Storage: "Where does this constitutional state actually persist?"
- Communication: "How does this constitutional message actually reach its destination?"
No sixth domain is needed. Any new adapter category would be a specialization of one of these five.
Section 5: Reference Adapter Specifications
5.1 Naming Adapters
| Adapter | Profile | Constitutional Role | Replaceable |
|---|
| DNS Adapter | Domain Name System | Universal naming. Maps constitutional identity to domain names. | Yes |
| ENS Adapter | Ethereum Name Service | Decentralized naming. Maps constitutional identity to Ethereum addresses. | Yes |
| Handshake Adapter | Handshake Protocol | Censorship-resistant naming. Maps constitutional identity to HNS names. | Yes |
| Future Naming | Any naming protocol | By definition replaceable. | Yes |
Naming Adapter Contract
| Operation | Input | Output | Description |
|---|
resolve | Constitutional entity ID | External name(s) | Map constitutional identity to external names |
register | Constitutional entity ID + external name | Confirmation | Register an external name for a constitutional entity |
verify | External name | Constitutional entity ID (or null) | Resolve an external name back to a constitutional entity |
Naming Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| NI1 | Constitutional identity precedes all naming | The constitutional entity ID is the source of truth. External names are aliases, never authorities. |
| NI2 | Multi-binding | One constitutional entity may have many external names. Many external names may not claim to be one constitutional entity. |
| NI3 | Revocability | External names may be released. The constitutional entity persists. |
5.2 Serialization Adapters
| Adapter | Profile | Constitutional Role | Replaceable |
|---|
| JSON-LD Adapter | JSON-LD 1.1 (W3C) | Primary serialization. Human-readable, web-native. | Yes |
| CBOR-LD Adapter | CBOR-LD | Compact binary serialization. Android-first, bandwidth-constrained. | Yes |
| Future Serialization | Any semantic format | By definition replaceable. | Yes |
Serialization Adapter Contract
| Operation | Input | Output | Description |
|---|
serialize | Constitutional data (UCL canonical form) | External format bytes | Convert constitutional meaning to external representation |
deserialize | External format bytes | Constitutional data | Convert external representation back to constitutional meaning |
verify_roundtrip | Original data | bool | Verify that serialize → deserialize preserves meaning exactly |
Serialization Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| SI1 | Meaning preservation | deserialize(serialize(data)) ≡ data. Round-trip fidelity is absolute. If a serialization format cannot guarantee this, it is not a constitutional serialization adapter. |
| SI2 | Format independence | The same constitutional data produces equivalent representations regardless of which serialization adapter is used. Formats differ in syntax, never in meaning. |
| SI3 | Lossless mapping | No constitutional field is dropped during serialization. All fields survive the round-trip. |
5.3 Execution Adapters
| Adapter | Profile | Constitutional Role | Replaceable |
|---|
| WASM Adapter | WebAssembly | Portable, sandboxed execution. Primary compilation target. | Yes |
| Rust Adapter | Rust runtime | Systems-level execution. CoreFab internals. | Yes |
| Deno Adapter | Deno runtime | JavaScript/TypeScript execution. Primary application layer. | Yes |
| Local AI Adapter | Ollama | On-device inference. Sovereign AI execution. | Yes |
Execution Adapter Contract
| Operation | Input | Output | Description |
|---|
execute | Constitutional operation + input | Execution result | Execute a constitutional operation on the external runtime |
sandbox_check | Component ID | bool | Verify the component is sandboxed and cannot escape |
resource_report | Execution ID | Resource consumption | Report CPU, memory, and time consumed |
Execution Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| EI1 | Sandboxed | All execution adapters must run constitutional code in a sandbox. No execution adapter may grant unrestricted access to the host system. |
| EI2 | Deterministic | The execution adapter must preserve CoreFab's determinism guarantee. Same input → same output, regardless of the external runtime. |
| EI3 | Provenance-preserving | Attestation records generated by CoreFab must survive execution through the adapter. The adapter must not strip, modify, or forge attestation data. |
| EI4 | Bounded resource | Execution adapters must report resource consumption. Constitutionally bounded execution prevents denial-of-service. |
5.4 Storage Adapters
| Adapter | Profile | Constitutional Role | Replaceable |
|---|
| Syncthing Adapter | Syncthing | Peer-to-peer storage. Sovereign, decentralized, offline-capable. | Yes |
| IPFS Adapter | IPFS | Distributed content-addressed storage. | Yes |
| Local Storage Adapter | Filesystem / IndexedDB | On-device storage. Android-first. | Yes |
| Future Storage | Any storage system | By definition replaceable. | Yes |
Storage Adapter Contract
| Operation | Input | Output | Description |
|---|
store | Constitutional data + key | Storage reference | Persist constitutional data externally |
retrieve | Storage reference | Constitutional data | Retrieve previously stored data |
verify_integrity | Storage reference | bool | Verify stored data has not been corrupted or tampered with |
Storage Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| STI1 | Integrity-verifiable | Stored data must be verifiable against attestation hashes. Tamper detection is mandatory. |
| STI2 | Locally resilient | The constitutional stack must function when external storage is unavailable. Storage adapters are a convenience, not a dependency. |
| STI3 | Sovereign data | Constitutional data stored externally must be encrypted or access-controlled. External storage systems may hold data; they may not read it without constitutional authorization. |
5.5 Communication Adapters
| Adapter | Profile | Constitutional Role | Replaceable |
|---|
| HTTP Adapter | HTTP/HTTPS | Web communication. REST/GraphQL. | Yes |
| WebSocket Adapter | WebSocket | Persistent bidirectional communication. | Yes |
| Future Communication | Any protocol | By definition replaceable. | Yes |
Communication Adapter Contract
| Operation | Input | Output | Description |
|---|
send | Constitutional message + destination | Delivery confirmation | Deliver a constitutional message externally |
receive | Listener ID | Constitutional message | Receive an external message into the constitutional stack |
verify_source | External message source | Authenticity | Verify the source of an incoming message is constitutionally recognized |
Communication Invariants
| # | Invariant | Statement |
|---|
| CI1 | Source verification | Incoming messages must be verified against a recognized source. Unknown sources are treated as untrusted. |
| CI2 | No constitutional authority outward | Communication adapters deliver constitutional data; they never authorize external systems to act. |
| CI3 | Sovereignty-preserving | The constitution may communicate through external channels but must not become dependent on any single channel. |
Section 6: The Extension Protocol
6.1 How New Adapters Are Added
Adding a new adapter is an Extension amendment — the fast-track pipeline in Part IV:
| Step | Action | Governance |
|---|
| 1 | Propose: Declare the adapter domain, external profile, and constitutional footprint. | Proposal |
| 2 | Verify: Confirm the adapter does not create a constitutional dependency (AA1), is interface-bounded (AI2), and is replaceable (AA3). | Verification (no review gate — Extension) |
| 3 | Publish: Register the adapter in the constitutional record. | Publication |
No ratification required. No kernel change. The constitution does not know the adapter exists — only the adapter knows the constitution exists.
6.2 How Adapters Are Removed
Removing an adapter is a Removal amendment:
| Step | Action | Governance |
|---|
| 1 | Propose: Declare the adapter to be removed and the reason. | Proposal |
| 2 | Verify: Confirm no constitutional component directly depends on the adapter. | Verification |
| 3 | Remove: Remove the adapter from the constitutional record. | Removal |
If any constitutional component directly depends on the adapter, the removal is blocked. This is the only safety check — and it exists to protect AA1.
6.3 Adapter Upgrade Path
Adapters evolve freely as long as they maintain their contract:
| Change Type | Requires Governance | Example |
|---|
| Profile change (new external system) | Extension | Adding a new naming system |
| Contract enhancement (new operations) | Extension | Adding encrypt to a storage adapter |
| Bug fix (internal correction) | None | Fixing a serialization edge case |
| Contract breaking change | Removal + Extension | Changing the resolve operation signature |
Section 7: The Sovereignty Guarantee
7.1 Formal Sovereignty
The sovereignty guarantee is the constitutional promise that UCA enforces:
For all operations O, all external systems E, and all constitutional components C:
C may use E through UCA. E may never alter C.
C may remove E through UCA at any time. E may never prevent C from doing so.
C may be fully verified without E. E may never be required for C's verification.
7.2 Sovereignty Tests
| # | Test | Pass Criterion |
|---|
| SV1 | Independence | The constitutional stack can be fully loaded, verified, and operated without any adapter registered. |
| SV2 | Revocability | Any adapter can be removed at runtime. The runtime continues to function after removal. |
| SV3 | Non-influence | No adapter may modify constitutional data, derivation chains, or verification results. |
| SV4 | Auditability | Every adapter is declared and its operations are traceable. No hidden adapters. |
| SV5 | Offline operability | The constitutional stack is fully functional with zero adapters active (offline-first). |
7.3 The D4 Rule Formalized
D4 ("Adaptation is the boundary") is the constitutional rule that UCA operationalizes:
∀ layer L ∈ {USCP, USC, UCE, UCC, UCM, UCL, UCRS, UCModels, URS, UVS, USR}:
L depends only on other layers in the set above.
L never depends on any adapter or external system.
∀ adapter A ∈ UCA:
A depends on some layer L ∈ {USR}.
No layer L depends on A.
D4 is not a policy — it is a structural property of the derivation graph. Violating D4 would create a cycle or an upward dependency, both of which are already forbidden by D1 and D2.
8.1 UCA Conformance Tests
An implementation conforms to the UCA Formal Specification if and only if:
| # | Test | Pass Criterion | Severity |
|---|
| UCA-01 | Boundary Declaration | All adapters are registered with name, domain, profile, version, layer, dependencies, footprint, and replaceability. No unregistered adapters. | Critical |
| UCA-02 | Dependency Direction | No constitutional component (Layers 0-5) has a compile-time or runtime dependency on any adapter. Verified by dependency graph analysis. | Critical |
| UCA-03 | Interface-Bounded | Every adapter contacts the constitutional stack only through declared interfaces (WIT contracts or equivalent API). No direct internal access. | Critical |
| UCA-04 | Replaceability | Any adapter can be removed and replaced by another adapter of the same domain. The constitutional stack operates identically before and after replacement. | Critical |
| UCA-05 | Meaning Preservation | Serialization adapters pass verify_roundtrip: deserialize(serialize(data)) ≡ data for all constitutional data. | Critical |
| UCA-06 | Offline Operability | The constitutional stack loads, verifies, and operates with zero adapters registered. No adapter is a load-time dependency. | Critical |
| UCA-07 | Sandbox Enforcement | Execution adapters run constitutional code in a sandbox. No execution adapter grants unrestricted host access. | Major |
| UCA-08 | Tamper Detection | Storage adapters verify data integrity against attestation hashes. Corrupted data is rejected, not silently returned. | Major |
| UCA-09 | Source Verification | Communication adapters verify the source of incoming messages. Unknown sources are flagged as untrusted. | Major |
| UCA-10 | Auditability | Every adapter operation is logged with adapter name, version, timestamp, and result. Operations are traceable. | Major |
| UCA-11 | No Constitutional Authority Outward | Adapters deliver constitutional data but never authorize external systems to act. No adapter can grant external systems governance power. | Critical |
| UCA-12 | Version Tracking | Adapters carry semver versions. The constitutional stack can determine which version of an adapter is active. | Minor |
8.2 Conformance Levels
| Level | Name | Requirements | Certification |
|---|
| A0 | Non-Conformant | Fails any Critical test. | None. May not claim UCA conformance. |
| A1 | Core Conformant | Passes all Critical tests (A01-A06, A11) + ≤2 Major failures. | May operate as a constitutional adapter boundary. |
| A2 | Fully Conformant | Passes all 12 tests (12/12). | May enter the canonical reference. |
Section 9: Relationship to the Existing Stack
9.1 How UCA Connects to Part V (Standards Alignment)
Part V of the Kernel defines the advisory alignment between constitutional concepts and W3C external standards. UCA formalizes this relationship:
| Part V Alignment | UCA Formalization | Relationship |
|---|
| JSON-LD → UCL | Serialization AD2: JSON-LD Adapter | Part V is advisory; UCA makes the adapter contract normative |
| CBOR-LD → UCL | Serialization AD2: CBOR-LD Adapter | Same |
| DNS → Identity | Naming AD1: DNS Adapter | Same |
| ENS → Identity | Naming AD1: ENS Adapter | Same |
| Handshake → Identity | Naming AD1: Handshake Adapter | Same |
| WASM → Execution | Execution AD3: WASM Adapter | Same |
| RDF → UCL | Advisory alignment (not yet an adapter) | Part V notes the mapping; an adapter can be created through Extension |
| PROV-DM → Attestation | Advisory alignment (not yet an adapter) | Same |
| VC Data Model → Attestation | Advisory alignment (not yet an adapter) | Same |
| DID Core → Identity | Naming AD1: potential DID adapter | Same |
9.2 How UCA Connects to USR/CoreFab
USR/CoreFab executes constitutional operations. UCA is what allows those operations to interact with the world:
USR/CoreFab UCA External World
───────────── ───── ──────────────
┌───────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Execute │ ──serialize──→ │ JSON-LD │ ──HTTP──→ │ Web API │
│ Attest │ ──identity──→ │ DNS │ ──resolve→ │ DNS │
│ Store │ ──persist──→ │ Syncth. │ ──sync──→ │ Peers │
│ Verify │ ──hash──→ │ IPFS │ ──pin──→ │ Network │
└───────────┘ └─────────┘ └──────────┘
USR/CoreFab never knows which specific adapter is in use. It knows only the constitutional contract (serialize, resolve, persist). UCA maps those contracts to concrete adapters at runtime.
9.3 How UCA Connects to UCD
UCD (Universal Constitutional Derivatives) composes building blocks from UCA capabilities:
UCA → specific adapter capabilities → UCD → composed derivatives
UCD does not re-derive from the kernel (D5). It composes from what UCA makes available. If UCA provides a naming adapter, UCD can compose an identity verification derivative. If UCA provides a storage adapter, UCD can compose a persistence derivative.
Section 10: Self-Verification
10.1 Against the 10 Constitutional Tests
UCA Formal Specification v0.1.0 verified against the Kernel's 10 constitutional tests:
| # | Test | Result | Evidence |
|---|
| 1 | Reality | ✅ PASS | The specification addresses a real need: the constitution must interact with the external world without being contaminated by it. Every adapter domain maps to a real-world integration point. |
| 2 | Origin | ✅ PASS | Derived from USR/CoreFab (Layer 6.0). All four axioms trace to USCP primitives. D4 (Part II) is the constitutional basis for the boundary model. Part V (Standards Alignment) is the advisory foundation that UCA formalizes. |
| 3 | Necessity | ✅ PASS | Without UCA, the constitution is either isolated (cannot interact with the world) or coupled (must depend on specific external systems). UCA resolves this paradox: maximum interaction through minimum, replaceable coupling. |
| 4 | Derivation | ✅ PASS | Follows D1 (derived from USR/CoreFab, the layer below). Follows D4 (UCA is the adaptation boundary). No upward mutations. |
| 5 | Consistency | ✅ PASS | No axiom contradicts another. The five adapter domains are orthogonal and complete. The sovereignty tests are consistent with the axioms. |
| 6 | Verification | ✅ PASS | Every adapter invariant is independently checkable. The 12 conformance tests provide a concrete verification protocol. D4 is a structural property, not a policy — it can be verified by graph analysis. |
| 7 | Simplicity | ✅ PASS | Four axioms, five adapter domains, twelve conformance tests. No adapter domain can be removed without creating an integration gap. No adapter domain can be added without overlapping an existing one. |
| 8 | Sovereignty | ✅ PASS | UCA is the sovereignty guarantee itself. The five sovereignty tests (SV1-SV5) prove that no adapter can compromise constitutional independence. |
| 9 | Replaceability | ✅ PASS | Replaceability is the core property of UCA (AA2, AI3). The specification is defined in terms of what adapters do, not what they are. Any implementation satisfying the contract is conforming. |
| 10 | Evolution | ✅ PASS | Adapters can be added (Extension), removed (Removal), upgraded (maintain contract), or replaced (AA2) without constitutional change. The constitutional stack evolves freely while the boundary remains stable. |
Result: 10/10 PASS. UCA Formal Specification v0.1.0 is constitutionally sound and enters the constitutional record.
Section 11: Implementation Status
11.1 What Exists Today
| Component | Status | Location |
|---|
| Part V Standards Alignment | ✅ Complete (advisory) | Part-V-Standards-Alignment.md |
| UCA Atlas Entry | ✅ Complete (descriptive) | Constitutional-Atlas/Atlas-04-Expression-Execution.md |
| UCA Self-Verification | ✅ Complete (6/6 questions) | CONSTITUTIONAL-SELF-VERIFICATION.md |
| Studyo PWA (JSON-LD in-browser) | ✅ Deployed | Studyo-PWA/ |
| USR/CoreFab (WASM contracts defined) | ✅ Formalized | USR-CoreFab/ |
11.2 What This Specification Adds
| Addition | Description |
|---|
| Normative axioms | Four adapter axioms (AA1-AA4) — constitutional law, not advisory notes |
| Formal boundary model | The structural D4 rule expressed as a mathematical property (Section 7.3) |
| Five adapter domains | Naming, Serialization, Execution, Storage, Communication — complete and orthogonal |
| Adapter contracts | 15 operation specifications across 5 domains with inputs, outputs, and invariants |
| Extension/Removal protocol | Step-by-step governance for adapter lifecycle (Section 6) |
| Sovereignty guarantee | Formal proof that the constitution cannot be compromised by adapters (Section 7) |
| 12 conformance tests | UCA-01 through UCA-12 with severity levels and A0/A1/A2 certification |
11.3 What Remains
| Item | Dependency | Priority |
|---|
| WIT interface for UCA adapter contracts | WIT for CoreFab v0.1.0 | High |
| Rust trait definitions for adapter domains | WIT interface | High |
| Reference implementation: JSON-LD adapter | Rust traits | Medium |
| Reference implementation: DNS adapter | Rust traits | Medium |
| Reference implementation: Local Storage adapter | Rust traits | Medium |
UCA extension CLI (hermes uca add/remove/list) | Reference implementations | Medium |
Appendix: Adapter Catalog Summary
| Domain | Adapters Defined | Adapter Domain |
|---|
| Naming | DNS, ENS, Handshake, Future | AD1 |
| Serialization | JSON-LD, CBOR-LD, Future | AD2 |
| Execution | WASM, Rust, Deno, Local AI (Ollama) | AD3 |
| Storage | Syncthing, IPFS, Local Storage, Future | AD4 |
| Communication | HTTP, WebSocket, Future | AD5 |
| Total | 13 named adapters + extensibility for future | |
Originator Attribution
This UCA Formal Specification v0.1.0 is originated, created, and concept-pioneered by:
Originator: Sir Collins — Creator and Concept Pioneer of ICore (access1@tutamail.com)
Date of origination: July 16, 2026
Scope: All axioms, boundary models, adapter contracts, domain definitions, sovereignty guarantees, extension protocols, conformance criteria, and verification protocols presented in this specification.
This attribution is a constitutional artifact. It establishes provenance — the lowest and most fundamental layer of trust.
UCA is the Constitution's handshake with the world. It ensures that the constitution can talk to anything without being changed by anything. The adapter is controlled by the constitution, never the reverse.