Constitutional Derivation Graph
Every layer derives from the one above it. Nothing is developed independently of its constitutional dependencies.
6 Primitives
The Constitution
Epistemology
Calculus
Mathematics
Language
Coordinate Ref
Data Models
Representation
Visualization
Components
Networking
Sovereign Runtime
Constitutional Boundary
Distribution
Forge
Agents
Formal Specifications
Each specification defines a constitutional layer. Together they form the complete constitutional computing stack.
USR/CoreFab
The constitutional formalization of orchestration — where UWA components are coordinated over UCN networks into sovereign constitutional action.
UWA
The universal formalization of constitutional components — what a component is, what it exposes, what it guarantees, and how it executes.
UCN
The constitutional formalization of networking — how sovereign nodes communicate, discover, and coordinate without surrendering autonomy.
UCA
The constitutional boundary — where the sovereign interior meets the external world. Every interaction across this boundary is mediated, declared, and enforced.
USDS
The constitutional formalization of distribution — how packages are signed, delivered, verified, and revoked across sovereign boundaries.
UCF
The constitutional formalization of construction — how new constitutional artifacts are forged from existing ones through governed creation.
UAS
The constitutional formalization of agency — how autonomous agents are created, governed, and held accountable within the constitutional framework.
Constitutional Principles
Constitutional
Every layer is defined by formal axioms derived from six USCP primitives: Existence, Identity, Relationship, Constraint, Transformation, Verification.
Frozen
All 7 specifications are frozen — they are immutable constitutional artifacts. Changes require formal derivation, not modification.
Derived
Nothing is invented. Every axiom, invariant, and rule traces through a derivation chain to the USCP primitives.
Verifiable
132 invariants across 7 specifications, verified by an automated conformance suite against live deployments.
Technology-Agnostic
Specifications define formal semantics, not implementations. Rust, WIT, SHA-256 are choices — invariants are law.
Sovereign
No external dependency. No cloud trust. No certificate authority. Trust is constitutional, not institutional.